|
“You shall appoint
magistrates and officers for
your tribes in all the
settlements and they shall
govern the people with due
justice”
Deuteronomy 16: 18
Oct2002-3.htm
On
December 16 2001, a letter
was sent to the PHRMG from
SHAI Police Headquarters.
The letter, or better
described, the curt note,
said: “With reference to
your letter regarding the
murder of Mohammed Shalash,
we hereby advise that a file
was opened by the Binyamin
Police and was closed by the
Jerusalem District Attorney
on the 17.6.2001.”
On
December 17, 2000, Mohamed
Shalash, an 18 year old
high-school student, along
with several classmates,
stood waiting for a taxi to
take him home from school;
perhaps they were throwing
stones at settlers cars on
the bypass road below.
A van with several settlers
passed by the boys, stopped,
turned around and returned
to where the boys stood. The
boys started to run away,
most running in the
direction of the town of
Abud. Mohammed, however, ran
in the opposite direction,
towards the nearby fields.
Two settlers exited the van
and one shot Mohammed in the
forehead, at close range,
killing him immediately.
Approximately three hours
later, the Israeli army
arrived with an ambulance,
and removed Mohammed’s body
to Abu-Kabir Hospital, where
he was autopsied. The police
immediately apprehended two
suspects.
Mohammed Shalash’s murder
would appear to be a simple
case to solve. There were
eyewitnesses to the crime.
An autopsy was performed
and the coroner’s report
established that Mohammed
had been shot at close
range. Most importantly, two
suspects from the Neve-Tsuf
settlement were apprehended
by the police in connection
with the murder and their
statements and photographs
appeared in the Israeli
daily newspaper ‘Ma’ariv.’
The two – Yair Ben-Ami and
Asher Amram - admitted being
at the scene of the crime,
at the time of the shooting,
claiming that they had been
stoned by the boys, and
therefore had shot in the
air “in self defense” and to
“frighten” the
stone-throwers.
Nothing, it seems, was
missing for prosecution:
there were suspects, there
were eyewitnesses, there was
evidence and there was a
motive.
A
month and a half after the
murder, PHRMG Executive
Director Bassem Eid wrote to
SHAI Police requesting
information on the status of
the Shalash murder
investigation. Almost two
months later, the SHAI
Police replied: “The
circumstances of Mohammed
Shalahs’s death are being
investigated by the Binyamin
Police Station. The case is
still under investigation.”
Several months later, the
PHRMG again wrote to SHAI
police, asking for an update
on the status of the
investigation. It was then
that we received the
one-line note from SHAI
Police, announcing – without
providing a reason, as
required by law
-
that the case had been
closed. The letter sent by
the PHRMG in January 2002 to
the prosecutor, requesting
that the case be reopened,
has, to date, remained
unanswered.
Thus, what appears to be an open-and-shut case involving the most brutal
crime possible, eventually
quietly disappeared into the
black hole of the Israeli
law enforcement system in
the Occupied Territories
(OT). Unfortunately, this
case is not unique. The vast
majority of settler crimes
committed against
Palestinians in the
West Bank
and Gaza Strip bear no
consequences for the
criminals: they are not
investigated by the police
and/or they are not
prosecuted by the State
Attorney. Settlers appear to
be immune from punishment
and Israeli law enforcement
authorities in the Occupied
Territories do the least
they can to protect
Palestinians from settler
violence, while still
maintaining some semblance
of law and order. It is the
aim of this report to both
describe the various types
of settler crimes handled by
the PHRMG Legal Unit and to
show the systematic manner
in which Israeli law
enforcement authorities
ignore these crimes which,
under both domestic Israeli
law and international law,
they are obliged to prevent
and punish. We will also
indicate the steps taken by
the PHRMG to impact upon
this unjust situation, by
exerting pressure so that
the criminals are prosecuted
and future violence is
deterred.
|