September 2000: Palestinian Education in East Jerusalem

 

Archives The Bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home

PUBLICATIONS & REPORTS

The Palestinian Human Rights Monitor
The bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG:

 
  
  
 

 School Daze:
 Palestinian Education in East Jerusalem:
A First-Hand Look
By Evan S. Weiss

V.            Conclusion

The East Jerusalem school system suffers from severely substandard conditions.  The educational infrastructure lacks sufficient classroom space, resulting in overcrowding and a high pupils per classroom ratio.  Without proper lighting and visual aids, the atmosphere in most classrooms is unsuitable for education.  Schools have inadequate facilities, lacking libraries, computer laboratories, science laboratories, and facilities for the arts and physical education.  Schools have insufficient amounts of equipment, like computers.  Those facilities that are available are substandard and learning materials are poorly distributed.

Resulting from insufficient availability of vocational training, the education system fails to channel students into appropriate academic and vocational programs.  Students better suited for vocational training lack motivation when placed in academic tracks.  They cause a breakdown in discipline, consume valuable learning materials, and impair the ability of teachers to teach.

To compensate for the classroom shortage, the government rents space in apartments and homes.  These spaces suffer from overcrowding, poor sanitation and ventilation, and structural dilapidation.  Schools also create additional classrooms by converting bomb shelters, teachers’ lounges and valuable library, science and computer facilities.  Materials from these facilities remain in storage, unused and unusable.

These conditions raise many human rights issues.  The State of Israel appears to violate international law by not providing ample classroom space and vocational training.  But, more disconcerting, Israel seems to discriminate between Jewish and Palestinian students by providing West Jerusalem students with superior facilities.  This suggests that Israel discriminates against Palestinian children based on their national identity.

One cannot rationalize these inequities by arguing that Israel provides Jewish children with better facilities because Jewish citizens pay more taxes.  Palestinian Jerusalemites pay taxes at the same rates as their Jewish counterparts accounting for 26 percent of municipal tax revenue.
[i]  Yet Palestinians receive only about 5 percent of municipal services.[ii]

The Wholistic Project, intended to resolve these disparities, is tacit recognition of their existence.  While the project brings much needed change to the school system, it cannot succeed without providing a dramatic increase in the number of classrooms and availability of vocational training.  The system requires, first and foremost, the ability to absorb all children wishing to enter, and it must be able to channel them into appropriate academic and vocational streams. Having done so, administrators and teachers can more easily maintain discipline.  When the system has absorbed all of the students, schools must provide a stimulating learning environment and the proper facilities for a modern education.

Not only is the Wholistic Project unlikely to succeed, it comes only now, as Palestinian and Israel negotiators enter final status negotiations.  When negotiations are concluded, the education system in East Jerusalem may very well fall under the authority of the PNA.  Since the Wholistic Project will probably not make dramatic improvements to the educational infrastructure in East Jerusalem, the PNA will face tremendous obstacles in educating Palestinian Jerusalemites.  Assuming there will be a Palestinian state, the PNA will have to devote substantial resources to the East Jerusalem education system during the costly, state-building process.

Why did the Wholistic Project come so late?  Israel has been responsible for the East Jerusalem education system for 33 years.  Is the Ministry of Education just beginning to realize its obligations in East Jerusalem?  Are such efforts political lip service to the international community?  For all of Israel’s rhetoric about an undivided capital, why has Israel not made the effort to unite the two sides of the city by offering East Jerusalemites the same benefits and services offered to West Jerusalemites?  If Palestinians pay 26 percent of the municipal taxes, why do they receive only 5 percent of municipal benefits?  As (Abu-A’zzam’s) son, Abed, put it, “With all these settlements they built, they couldn’t build a school over here?”

 

 


Writer of the report (a profile)
Evan S. Weiss, is a fourth year student at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. He will be graduating in May 2001 with a bachelors degree in Middle East Studies. In addition to his voluntary internship in the PHRMG offices in East Jerusalem, Evan also worked in the Middle East/North Africa Division at Human Rights Watch in Washington, UAS.

 

 

 


[i] Badil.  Eviction from Jerusalem: Restitution and the Protection of Palestinian Rights.  Badil, Bethlehem, 1999.  p. 20 as cited in Kahn, Azra.  Op Cit.  p. 18.

[ii] Badil.  Op Cit. as cited in Kahn, Azra.  Op Cit.  p. 18.

 

     
 
 

Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home