June 2000: Political Arrest....... What for?

 

 

Archives The bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home

PUBLICATIONS & REPORTS

The Palestinian Human Rights Monitor
The bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG:

 Political Arrest....... What for?
Volume 4, Issue 3: The Palestinian Human Rights Monitor

 

8. Categories of Prisoners

Since 1994, the PA has detained about 400 prisoners on political grounds. Of these there are still around 250 in detention. Reasons for detaining these prisoners vary. The following classifies them into three categories.

a) Political Prisoners

These individuals are detained on the basis of a suspicion that they are members of Islamic or leftist groups that oppose the peace process with Israel. Most of them belong to either Hamas Islamic movement or to the Islamic Jihad. They are usually arrested as part of a campaign of arrest carried out by the PA following certain political events. They remain in prison for long periods of time with no charge or trial.

Since the coming of the PA, the PHRMG has documented five such campaigns conducted by the PA Security Services against Hamas and al-Jihad activists:

Ø     Immediately after taking over, the PA began its political arrest Marathon by arresting 800 people. Most of these were released after few days, while others were kept in detention for approximately 50 days.

Ø     At the end of February 1996, about 1200 people affiliated with Islamic groups were detained in the largest wave of arrests since the Oslo agreement. Following this campaign, the phenomenon of torturing prisoners in the PA prisons started to spread.

    Ø     After the assassination of Moheyeddin al-Sharif, one of the leaders of Hamas military branch in 1998, about 40 Islamic activists from the district of Ramallah were detained.

    Ø     The year 1999 witnessed two campaigns, one in January and another in August. The later one included the detention of 47 persons following the signing of the Sharm (amended Wye Agreement)

 Arresting political activists normally occurs because of pressure exerted on the PA by the USA and Israel to detain “terrorists”, since they believe that the biggest threat to the peace process is terrorism.

 

 b) Prisoners of Conscience

 Political arrest also includes those political figures who criticize the PA, including human rights activists and journalists. Such arrests, of course, lead to wide-spread condemnation. Consequently they are usually released within few days. In some cases however, detention continues for years. Dr. Abdel-Aziz Rantisi, for example, was detained from 9 April 1998 to 7 February 2000 following remarks he made to the Jerusalem Post newspaper. In November 1999, 9 well-known political personalities were detained after they had participated in issuing a communiqué which criticized the PA and President Arafat for the spread of corruption inside the PA.

 c) Security Prisoners

 These are individuals detained by the PA on the basis of being suspected of collaboration with Israel. Article 16(2) of the Oslo Agreement forbids the bringing of such individuals to trial. Consequently, they are to be “detained for life”. Most of such prisoners are detained by the Military Intelligence Service, headed by General Mousa Arafat. Human Rights organizations are not permitted to visit Military Intelligence Detention Centers, which are feared by the public. According to an Amnesty International Report, there are approximately 250 security prisoners in PA jails who have not been charged and who have not been brought to trial. This state of affairs has come about because Palestinian law is flexible with its provisions relating to the charge of “collaboration”.

 PHMRG is greatly concerned with the way in which the PA deals with the charge of “collaboration”, as this charge has been used to tarnish the reputation of politicians from the opposition. Moreover, officers from the Security Services use this charge to get rid of people with whom they have had personal disputes. Those charged with “collaboration” do not receive the opportunity to defend themselves in a fair trial.

 

       
     
     
 
 

Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home