Archives The bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home

PUBLICATIONS & REPORTS

The Palestinian Human Rights Monitor
The bi-monthly publication of the PHRMG:

March 1999: Palestinian Prisoners... an issue still pending
Background  

The case of Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons has been and remains a very sensitive issue for the Palestinian people, especially after the Peace Accords. For the Palestinians, Palestinian prisoners have sacrificed their freedom, in some cases for over 27 years, in the name of the Palestinian cause. The number of Palestinian and Arab prisoners currently in Israeli jails amounts to 2250, of whom 1000 were arrested prior, and 1250 after, the Oslo Accords.

Statistics on Prisoners in Israeli Jails,

Ministry of Detainees’ Affairs

Over 600,000 arrests were made by the Israelis since the Occupation in 1967

Over 500 Palestinian prisoners are held in Israeli jails without trial

7 women detainees are held in Talmond prison

120 detainees are sick, 25 are elderly men and approximately 60 are children

20 detainees are held in solitary confinement

40 detainees are Palestinians with Israeli nationality

130 detainees are from other Arab countries

 

 

 

Following the signing of the Wye River Accords, there was renewed hope among Palestinian prisoners for their release. This hope waned on Israel’s implementation of the vague Wye provisions on prisoners. The release involved only petty criminals, unconvicted prisoners and prisoners who had almost finished their sentences. This situation led to an extreme state of depression among prisoners as well as to anger directed against the Palestinian negotiator who had not signed a clear and concise agreement with Israel on this matter.

During the negotiations leading to the Wye Accords, Israel had agreed to release 750 prisoners in three stages and agreed that a list of names of these prisoners would be drawn up at a later date. The written Agreement at Wye does not mention prisoner release.

In a subsequent meeting that was held on 17 November 1998 between the Israeli Minister of Internal Security, Avigador Kahalani, and the Palestinian representatives, which included the Minister for Detainees’ Affairs, Hisham Abdul Razeq, Secretary of State Abu Mazen and Head of the Preventative Security Service (PSS) in Gaza, Muhammad Dahlan, the list of prisoners’ names was not discussed. “Instead, the principles were discussed”.

These principles included a suggestion by Israel that only 94 of the 250 detainees whom Israel would release during the first stage of releases would be political prisoners, whilst the rest would be petty criminals. The Palestinian delegation did not accept this and Minister Kahalani had to return to reconsider the issue with the Israeli government.

 

On 19 November 1998, the Israelis informed Abdul Razeq that the Israeli position regarding the release of prisoners remained unchanged, whilst Minister Abdul Razeq responded by confirming the Palestinian’s rejection of the Israeli position. Consequently, Israel ignored the Palestinian position and on 20 November 1998 released the 250 prisoners.

Israel then produced a list of the names of the 750 prisoners who had (and who would still) be released. According to Israeli classifications, 500 of these prisoners are criminals whilst 250 are political prisoners. Some prisoners only had a few days to complete their sentence, one of the released prisoners stating on Israeli TV, “I only had two more days to complete my sentence.”

In addition, 20 of the 250 released prisoners had only been recently arrested.

 

As a result of Clinton’s visit to the region and of depression amongst some prisoners, the remaining prisoners went on hunger strike, beginning on 5 December 1998. The aim of this action was not to make specific demands, but rather to raise the case of Palestinian prisoners during negotiations chaired by President Clinton.

 

With the outbreak of the hunger strike, a campaign was simultaneously launched in support of the prisoners during a press conference held in Ramallah on 5 December 1998. Those participating in the conference included Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) member Qadurah Faris, Director of the Prisoners Society in Bethlehem, Issa Qaraqe’e, Director of Al-Dameer (Consciousness) for the Relief of Prisoners, Abdul Latif Geith and Dr. Samir Shehadeh (the father of a prisoner).

 

The hunger strike was also accompanied by an extensive international campaign. The day before the beginning of the strike, the Prisoners Society had sent letters in the name of the prisoners to ambassadors, consuls and foreign representatives to the PNA in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. The letters requested that the aforementioned groups take the subject of prisoners seriously and that they put pressure on Israel to respect its undertakings made to the PNA on the matter.

 

Actions to show solidarity with these prisoners varied from hunger strikes through tent sit-ins to organized marches in many West Bank and Gaza Strip cities. Following orders from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Forces used violence against the demonstrators. As a result, four people were killed and hundreds were injured.

 

All Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails participated in the strike, including those who were sick in Israeli hospitals. Inevitably their conditions worsened and in some cases became critical.

 

On 12 December 1998, during a press conference that was held with the Jordanian Prime Minister Fayez al-Tarawneh upon his visit to Gaza, President Arafat called on prisoners to discontinue their action, by stating, “let us call on the prisoners who are on a hunger strike in Israeli jails and ask them to end their strike.”

In light of the fact that the prisoners thought diplomatic efforts and negotiations would not have a positive impact, they had reacted with skepticism to the President’s request to end the strike. In the words of one of the prisoners in Ashquelon prison: “Arafat asked us to cease the strike and give him a chance, but because we know the way in which Netanyahu thinks we are not optimistic.”

Ending the hunger strike

 

The prisoners brought an end to their strike on 15 December 1998 for the following reasons:

 

With the coming to an end of President Clinton’s visit and with the successful bringing of the prisoner’s cause to the negotiating table at the summit between the three leaders, the short-term aim of the strike and been achieved.

The prisoners accepted Arafat’s request to give the Palestinian negotiator a chance to deal with, and to resolve, their case.

On 14 December 1998, the prisoners received news through the media and from sources in the Israeli army and Shabak (Israeli General Security Service (GSS)) about the Israeli army and GSS’s support for the release of prisoners convicted of killing Israelis. The motivation for this support was to relaunch security cooperation with the PNA and to put an end to demonstrations and marches in support of the prisoners.

Did the prisoner’s strike achieve its aims?

 

The strike succeeded in achieving some of its aims and failed in achieving others. The success included:

Forcing Arafat, Netanyahu, and Clinton to discuss the case of prisoners during the summit, held at Erez checkpoint on 15 December 1998. According to Clinton’s statements during the press conference held after the summit the three parties had agreed during the meeting on forming an informal committee to deal with the case of the prisoners. The Minister of Detainees’ Affairs has however denied the existence of such an agreement and claims to be unaware of the existence of any such committee.

Raising the cause of prisoners on national and international political agendas.

Reaffirming the effectiveness of passive resistance behind bars.

 

The strike may have failed to alter the official short-term Israeli view, because of the change that may take place as a result of the forthcoming Israeli elections on 17 May 1999.

The Palestinian Ministry of Detainees’ Affairs view on the procedures taken in solving the case of detainees

 

A solution to the prisoner’s case must be found through negotiation with Israel and through a written and clear agreement, which identifies the number of prisoners in jails, their specific charges and the dates of anticipated release. The Palestinian Minister believes that the prisoner issue must be resolved during the final status negotiations “because it is not possible to sign a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine until all Palestinian prisoners and Arabs who have participated in the Palestinian struggle remains in Israeli jails.”

 

 
 

Our Profile  I News &  Events I The Monitor  I Resources I Links I Subscriptions I Home