|
The Collaborator
By: GERSHOM
GORENBERG
Times
News
M.
lives in a one-bedroom apartment on the main street of an
Israeli town. Square, graceless apartment blocks covered in
exhaust-stained stucco, their windows shuttered against the
Levantine sun, stand above a supermarket, a hamburger joint and
a booth selling lottery tickets, all buffeted by the growls of
buses. It is a place whose only character is that it is
indistinguishable from dozens of other Israeli main streets
built in haste. As a setting for an espionage story, it belongs
not to an airport thriller but to a Graham Greene tale, one in
which a decent man makes one apparently sensible choice and
finds himself in a grim labyrinth. M. is that man.
M.
is Palestinian, but speaks Hebrew with only a hint of his native
Arabic. Even when indoors, he wears a pair of wraparound
sunglasses pushed to the top of his head, a standard Israeli
affectation. He joined Israeli society years ago, without
realizing it, when he was recruited by Israel's Shin Bet
security service to provide information about other
Palestinians. On the surface, he has learned to fit in Israel.
But on a deeper level, he is a displaced person, a casualty of a
long war, a man whose peculiar wound is the amputation of a
place to belong to.
Our
meeting was arranged by the Security Administration for
Assistance (S.A.A.), a wing of the Shin Bet set up in 1994 after
the signing of the first Oslo accord to help Palestinian
informers leave the West Bank and rebuild their lives inside
Israel. The condition set by his handlers was that M. would be
identified by no more than one initial. Palestinian society sees
him as a traitor, and his family remains in danger. His wife and
children still live in the northern West Bank village where M.
grew up and lived until a dozen years ago, when parties unknown
discovered that he was collaborating with Israel.
The
Shin Bet has been the main agency responsible for gathering
intelligence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip since Israel's
conquest of those areas in 1967. For security officials,
recruiting Palestinian informers is an essential tool. Eighty
percent of all attempted terror attacks, according to a
spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces, are prevented on the
basis of intelligence. Much of it comes from informers.
The
S.A.A. refused to let M. answer questions about what information
he passed on to Israeli intelligence or how he had gathered it.
So before I met with M., I spoke with Roy Politi, who spent
several years in the occupied territories as an Israeli Police
operative, working closely with Shin Bet. He recently published
''Rabbits on the Roof,'' a novel written in Hebrew about working
with collaborators. As Polity explained to me, the first meeting
between an operative and a potential informer resembles a chess
game in which one side has three queens and the other is playing
only with pawns. The operative has been chosen from among the
best and the brightest and has been intensively trained. From
other sources, he is likely to know a great deal already about
the man in the room with him. The target, on the other hand, is
very likely to know little about the operative.
While
the Shin Bet will say nothing about how it conducts its covert
battle against terror groups, published (and censored) testimony
by ex-officials, along with Palestinian human rights reports,
creates an outline of how the agency has recruited and run
collaborators over the years. In the best case, the operative
who is meeting a prospective informer can provide something the
target wants -- such as money. One ex-informer, recounting to me
his decision to work with the Shin Bet at the beginning of the
Israeli occupation, stated bluntly that money was his motive:
''I came from hunger. You see bread in front of you. You're not
going to take it?'' It's often not much bread. Yaakov Perry, who
headed the Shin Bet from 1988 to 1995, notes in his
autobiography, ''Strike First,'' that payments to informers are
necessarily small, lest ''sudden riches arouse suspicion.''
Another
form of payoff has been the Israeli-issued permits needed by
residents of the occupied territories -- a permit to work or do
business in Israel or a ''family reunification'' permit,
allowing a Jordanian-born wife, say, to join her husband in the
West Bank. In one case Perry describes, a Palestinian man sought
a permit for his wife to receive gynecological treatment at the
Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem; Perry, then a young operative,
offered to secure the permit if the man would sign up as an
informer.
Business
contracts have provided another lever, says Bassem Eid,
head of the East Jerusalem-based Palestinian Human Rights
Monitoring Group, which condemns Israeli use of informers as
a violation of human rights and international law. ''The
[Israeli] Civil Administration decides to pave a road,'' Eid
says. ''A Palestinian businessman applies to get the contract.
It's worth millions of shekels. Some will collaborate to get
access.''
An
operative can also play on the rivalries that fragment
Palestinian society, exploiting the gaps between ''the Dehaishe
refugee camp and the people with the big houses next to it,''
Polity says, ''or between Hamas and the secularists.'' The agent
will try to convince the potential Palestinian recruit that by
collaborating, he will be doing the right thing for his own
people. Indeed, another ex-informer said that he agreed to work
with the Shin Bet because he witnessed a bloody grenade attack
by Palestinians against Israeli civilians. ''If you want to
carry out attacks, get soldiers,'' the man said. ''Not the
civilians. That's against religion and law.''
Israel
has also used stronger inducements, Eid says, like
offering a deal to someone arrested as a drug pusher or as a car
thief: ''We'll close the file if you become a collaborator.'
Most will accept.'' Palestinians have also charged that Israeli
recruiters use sexual blackmail, but confirmation is hard to
come by. There is one known case of Shin Bet's using sexual
blackmail, but it was against Jewish terrorists. In the early
80's, the agency was hunting Israeli extremists who had set
bombs in the cars of two West Bank mayors and the garage of a
third. The investigation was going nowhere when Shin Bet
investigators discovered that a settler known for extreme views
had been having an affair. They arrested him, took him to a
Jerusalem hotel room and showed him a video, taken in the same
room, of him in the act with his lover. They threatened to show
his wife the video unless he told everything he knew about the
bombing. (The man refused.) Presumably, the agency has used
similar methods on Palestinians.
Once
someone has given Israel a bit of information, a canny operative
can force him to provide more information by threatening to
unmask him as an informer. That is one purpose of paying a
source, Perry says. ''The money . . . incriminates him, so that
turning back becomes much harder for him, if not impossible.''
Recruiting
an activist who is already deep within a hostile Palestinian
organization provides his controllers with the quickest payoff.
But Perry's account shows that outsiders also have value. An
informer meeting his controller -- at a secret spot in the
occupied territories or in an apartment the agency has rented
inside Israel for the purpose -- can bring tips about what is
happening in a village or refugee camp: who, for instance, has
taken to meeting whom under the fig tree at the edge of town. If
an informer usually travels to work in a neighbor's van, Perry
says, his controller may tell him to switch to the bus, so he
can ''stop off on the way home at a crowded coffee house and
keep an ear out for information that moves around such places.''
M.
was an adolescent when Israel conquered the West Bank in 1967.
His family, like nearly everyone in his village, fled to the
mountains before the Jews arrived. After three weeks of sleeping
under trees, they returned to the village. Their neighbors, they
saw, had gone home and had not been slaughtered. Every day, one
or two army jeeps passed through the village. At first, children
ran away; later, they grew used to the patrols, M. remembers.
Sometimes soldiers got out and played soccer with them.
At
16, he left school to work for Israeli farmers just across the
half-erased border. ''They'd visit me at home on Saturdays,'' he
says. ''Everyone had Jews coming. On Saturdays two-thirds of the
village was Jews.''
Those
were the relatively quiet years of the occupation. Palestinians
became Israel's unskilled workers, and a few patrolling soldiers
were enough to control the territory. Beneath the surface,
P.L.O. factions operated, trying to rip the quiet by attacking
Israelis. Once, M. remembers, several Fatah men shot at an
Israeli bus that came to town to bring villagers to work in
Israel. ''I was always against that stuff,'' M. says. ''They'd
try to recruit people. They'd come with a bunch of money to pay
for every time you'd attack the Jews.''
No
one tried to enlist M. for Fatah. They knew he was a friend of
the mukhtar, the man serving as the village's
go-between with the Israeli authorities. It was another
Palestinian, already working with the Shin Bet, who suggested he
become an informer. ''We were against any kind of terror,'' M.
explains. ''I came to the conclusion that was the only way for
me.'' He says nothing more about how he was recruited, and in
fact he may know nothing more. For an ex-collaborator living on
the Israeli side, of course, there is a motivation to describe
the decision to inform as a matter of principle, not the result
of pressure or greed.
When
M. was recruited in 1987, the era of low-key occupation was
coming to a close. Before the year ended, rebellion swept
through the West Bank; frustration and humiliation
transmogrified into nationalism. To be known as an informer was
now deadly -- and M. became known.
''I've
got no idea how they found it out,'' he says. But they did, and
fear followed. Twice the house of the mukhtar was torched. Every
day, M. says, he heard news of collaborators being hanged in
other villages.
One
night, a dozen masked men pounded on the door of his parents'
house, where he still lived with his wife and four young
children. His wife went to the door. The men outside carried
axes and knives. She said he wasn't home. They gave her a note:
he had 48 hours to leave the village.
A
nearby office of the Israeli military government gave him a
permit to stay inside Israel around the clock. From then on, he
spent his nights wherever he worked. ''If I worked at a farm,''
he says, ''I slept in the tool shed.'' He had agreed to cross
the line; now, having lost control of his own life, he found
that he had crossed the border permanently.
He
slowly lets out smoke from a cigarette as he tells his story in
a tone beyond resignation. He saw his family once every week or
two, usually at a Jewish settlement, and only for a few minutes.
After the Israeli pullout from much of the West Bank in 1995, he
decided that even his brief meetings with his family were too
risky.
Meanwhile,
friends who were ex-collaborators told him about the S.A.A. and
explained that he could apply to it for help. His application
was accepted, and he was given an apartment in a Jewish town and
later an Israeli ID card. His wife and children turned down the
S.A.A.'s offer to move them to Israel. ''The kids are big
already, and my wife wouldn't be able to handle it,'' M. says.
''Life is completely different here.'' M. could not ask his
family to cross into a world they didn't know. He was alone.
In
more ways than one, collaborators are a Palestinian nightmare.
During the first Palestinian uprising, between the end of 1987
and the signing of the Oslo accord in 1993, about 1,000
Palestinians suspected of being collaborators were murdered by
other Palestinians, according to the Palestinian Human Rights
Monitoring Group. That is nearly as many as the 1,000-plus
Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in the same period.
Bassem
Eid estimates that fewer than half of the accused
collaborators actually worked with Israel in any way. Even
rumors could be fatal. Under the cover of charges of
collaboration, clan vendettas and old accounts between criminal
gangs were settled. Killings were sometimes preceded by torture
-- ''nails in the knees, molten plastic in the ears,'' says Roy
Politi, the former intelligence operative -- and followed by
mutilation.
Under
the 1994 Cairo agreement between Israel and the Palestinians and
the following year's Oslo II agreement, the Palestinian
Authority promised to protect the safety of Palestinians who had
worked with Israel in the past. But when the Palestinian
leadership arrived from Tunis in 1994, says Gideon Ezra, the
former deputy director of Shin Bet and now a Likud politician
and the deputy minister of internal security, ''the only thing
that interested them was who had worked for Israel.'' So Israel
set up the S.A.A., and hundreds of ex-intelligence sources and
their families were moved to Israel and given help learning
Hebrew, getting jobs and finding new homes. The relocated
informers were relieved to be out of danger but were not
necessarily happy. ''Were you to ask them if they had the chance
to do it over, would they collaborate, some of them wouldn't,''
Ezra reflects. ''If they'd known Israel was going to pull out,
some of them wouldn't have joined up.''
Many
more informers, it seems certain, were never exposed and
remained in the occupied territories. ''The hidden ones stayed
to keep on working,'' Ezra says. Bassem Eid estimates
that ''tens of thousands'' of collaborators were recruited in
the years before the Oslo accord. Israeli intelligence veterans
suggest that Palestinians exaggerate the numbers but say that
the pervasive fear they create makes it harder for terrorists to
operate.
With
the beginning of the new uprising in September 2000, the
Palestinians' hunt for collaborators accelerated. One reason,
Eid argues, was Israel's assassination policy. In an effort to
end Palestinian violence, Israel has killed key Palestinian
activists, often in pinpoint strikes: a helicopter gunship
hurling a missile at a wanted man's car, a pay telephone
exploding as an Islamic Jihad leader talks on it. Many
Palestinians assume the information needed for hits comes from
turncoats.
In
January 2001, following brief trials, two alleged collaborators
were executed by firing squads in Gaza and Nablus. An
international outcry led Yasir Arafat to withhold his approval
for further executions. Instead, convicted collaborators were
jailed, as were many others who were arrested but never tried.
When Israel began its massive incursion into West Bank cities
this spring, Palestinian vigilantes removed many of the
suspected collaborators from prisons to prevent Israel from
rescuing them. Between late March and the end of May, at least
26 accused collaborators were murdered.
Despite
the witch hunt, most Israelis and Palestinians presume that
Israel is still gathering information and even recruiting new
informers. Against the fear that could dissuade collaborators,
there are new pressures to compel Palestinians to work with
Israel: deeper poverty and the increased difficulty of moving
even from one town to another on roads shut by Israeli
checkpoints. Moreover, ''People on the Palestinian street have
doubts about Arafat,'' Politi says, and as he sees it, a clever
operative should be able to exploit those doubts.
IN
MARCH 2001, M.'s sister phoned to tell him their elderly mother
was in bad health and wanted to see him. He decided to chance
it: he would drive across to the West Bank and into the village
during Friday prayers, when everyone would be in the mosque.
''My luck,'' he says, exhaling smoke, ''didn't pan out.''
As
he pulled into his family's yard, a van drove up behind him.
Eight Palestinian men with drawn pistols got out. ''They said:
'We're from the security service. You'll come with us for a
half-hour.'
''They
took me outside the village, tied me up, covered my eyes and
threw me on the floor of the car,'' M. recounts. ''I thought I'd
get a bullet in my head any moment.'' Instead, they drove him to
Nablus, to Jneid Prison. Later he was held at the Nablus Central
Prison, a Turkish-era building that served Israel before it
served the Palestinian Authority.
M.'s
interrogation lasted 46 days. ''They tie you to a chair with
your hands behind you for four, five, six hours,'' he says,
using the second person for distance.
They
beat him, he says. They hung him for hours by his hands from the
sprinkler pipes on the ceiling, took him down to give him 10
minutes to eat and hung him up again. Though his career as an
informer had ended long before the Oslo accord, they insisted he
was still working for the Shin Bet and had converted to Judaism.
At midnight one night, the commander came to him with a piece of
paper. ''He said, 'What's written here, you have to confess
to.''' M. has no idea what the paper said, but he signed.
He
spent a year in the prison, in the wing that held suspected
collaborators, in a room with 33 other men. Early this past
spring, two prisoners were taken out of the cell and shot. M.
assumed the same could happen to him at any time.
In
April, the prisoners in the Nablus prison heard the news that
Israeli tanks were positioned on four sides of the city. Across
the West Bank, Israeli forces were rolling into Palestinian
cities in response to the Passover suicide bombing in a Netanya
hotel. In M.'s cell, the news ignited desperate hope.
The
escape began when they heard tanks outside. Between the top of
the cell door and the ceiling was a few feet of wall. ''We broke
apart two beds and took the angle irons,'' M. says. His words
are suddenly flowing, vibrant; telling about this moment, he has
become the hero in his own life, the subject rather than the
object. ''We lifted two guys up, and they dug and pulled out the
first stone.'' Removing another stone, they had an opening to
the corridor, which led to the exercise yard, where they climbed
the wall.
Outside,
they saw two Israeli tanks down the street. ''I stripped to my
underwear, so they wouldn't think I was a suicide bomber, and
ran to the tanks and shouted, 'Save me!''' M. says. ''The hatch
opened, and a young guy got out and said, 'Where are you
from?''' M. yelled the name of the Israeli town where he had
been living.
M.
and the other prisoners were taken to the nearby office of the
Nablus governor, now in Israeli hands. M.'s luck had changed:
the tanks had arrived before the vigilantes.
Several
days later he was back in Israel. The S.A.A. gave him a hotel
room, and he began putting his life back together. He took out a
loan to buy a car, replacing the one he had lost driving to his
mother's house 14 months earlier. He hasn't seen a doctor since
his release. ''If I get a checkup, I'll end up sitting in a
hospital, and who will provide for my children?'' he says.
Before he was imprisoned, he made $1,100 a month as a gardener
and sent two-thirds to his family on the West Bank; while he was
in prison, his family's main source of income evaporated.
He
is back to sending them money, but M.'s family recently asked
him ''not to call three times a week,'' he says. ''Once a week
is enough.'' They are afraid. Nor can they visit him in Israel:
today, in the midst of the uprising, few Palestinians are
allowed to cross the line, and M.'s family can't get permits.
Once, access to official permits was an advantage of being an
informer. No longer, it seems, at least not for an ex-informer.
Though M.'s wife and children are but a few miles away, they
might as well be on the other side of the globe.
Through
an agency, he found an apartment. But he misjudged the
neighborhood. On his second night in the flat, at 3 in the
morning, he says, hundreds of his new neighbors gathered around
the building, tossing stones through his windows and pounding on
his door. ''They shouted, 'Death to Arabs!''' he says in a quiet
voice. ''I never thought Jews would do that to me.'' On the
street, they smashed the windows of his car and broke off the
mirrors.
Finally,
M. says, two jeeps of paramilitary border police, used for riot
control, came to evacuate him. The commander, he says, ''told
me: 'You're going out. If they curse you, don't answer.''' He
takes a drag from his cigarette and slowly exhales the smoke.
''It hurt.''
Three
days before our meeting, he moved into his current apartment.
''The neighbors here are really nice,'' he says. He holds up one
hand and adds, ''The fingers aren't the same length,'' an Arabic
proverb meaning that ''people aren't all the same.'' But the
proverb hasn't stopped his bad dreams or cured his fear of a
knock on the door. And it can't change the fact that a man
tortured as a ''Jew'' in Nablus was persecuted as an Arab in
Israel. He lives, he admits, in no-man's land; he belongs
nowhere.
On
the far side of the line, his family is caught in the web of
Israeli military checkpoints, meant to keep terrorists from
moving; on the side where he lives, every day brings new alerts
of possible bombings, information presumably gleaned in part
from Palestinian informers.
What,
I ask M., does he hope for? The very question surprises him.
What he could hardly hope for in prison he has already received:
freedom and the chance to support his family again.
''That
there will be peace,'' M. answers without emotion. Perhaps he is
just reciting accepted words. Perhaps, for the ex-collaborator
from whom the conflict has drawn a price he never imagined, hope
seems too dangerous. I leave him in the small apartment. I, at
least, am able to go home.
Gershom
Gorenberg is the author of ''The End of Days: Fundamentalism and
the Struggle for the Temple Mount'' and is the associate editor
of The Jerusalem Report, a newsmagazine. |